Showing posts with label NYFA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NYFA. Show all posts

Too Soon For Hulk Smash?

Friday, June 13, 2008


It's been five years since the release of Ang Lee's film version of everyone favorite comic book green guy, The Incredible Hulk and I'm inclined to say, "Ang, Ang, he's our man...if he can't do it, no one can." Well guess what, the Oscar winning director couldn't make a viable film out of the Hulk character, so if such an able director isn't able to make movie magic...can anyone?" Enter Louis Leterrier, whose previous notable directorial efforts include The Transporter and The Transporter 2, to try and fix or even create a franchise for the muscular grass toned comic book hero with sad walking away music. I'm of the school that says this is not possible. The Hulk just doesn't seem like a deep enough character. Sure having Ed Norton playing the title role does not hurt but seeing a big CGI green guy yelling "HULK SMASH!" just hasn't made my list of things to do in five years and I'm not inclined to do so again. The problem lies in the depth of the actual super-hero. I never really thought there was anything special about a superhero that gets really big and green and needs anger management classes. Though I was a fan of the TV show, it was more for the mere ridiculousness of seeing Lou Ferrigno in a bad
paint job and cut-off shorts...and of course the walking away music. So there are two questions that remain in regards to this weekend's release of the latest Incredible Hulk installment; first, can they pull it off? Secondly, will anyone care? Perhaps the 2nd question is the most important. After all if a tree falls in the woods and the Incredible Hulk debuts in theaters and no one is there to see it, does it actually matter? All negativity aside, I think The Incredible Hulk will get a sizable audience this weekend. There are enough superhero fanatics to give this franchise a second chance. The question remains will they walk into the theater with that glint in their eye saying, "don't make me waste $12 on this movie...you wouldn't like me when I waste $12 on a movie". By the second or third act most movie theaters in the country could be in ruins.



This blog is published by The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy. Visit our website to learn more about our exciting curriculum!

If you enjoyed this article please share it!

Panda Express

Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Greetings film fanatics, while the heat may have wreaked havoc on our sweat glands and electric bills...the film industry was busy flourishing for yet another fruitful weekend at the summerbox office. Kung Fu Pandaand Jack Black vehicle which scored big with a $60.2 million take this weekend, we're slightly surprised by Adam Sandler's continued drawing power. Though in all honesty I shouldn't be so quick to judge since I haven't seen his latest film. Either way, for the 4th straight week, we've got a brand new #1. Indiana Jones managed to hold strong at the #3 spot coming in just above Sex and The City which still raked in a respectable $21.8 million for the two day span, though it seems likely that the latter will continue to fade fast since mostly everyone who's in that target audience has already had their dose of lady-centric cinema. The Strangers held on at the #5 position fulfilling the needs of those jonesing to be very afraid in a comfortably air-conditioned movie theater. Maybe we should take a cue from all of those film fans and get in line ourselves.



This blog is published by The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy. Visit our website to learn more about our exciting curriculum!

If you enjoyed this article please share it!

Lackluster Blockbuster

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Film fans, I am completely dumbfounded. It seems my powers of prediction should be held under suspicion after last week's post in which we had the audacity to proclaim that Sex and The City's opening weekend would trump that of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls, turning it into perhaps the biggest blockbuster of the summer. However, when the numbers came out on Sunday night my jaw was agape in disbelief. Frankly, I think someone got their math a little wrong. Every single female I know and even some men went to to see Sex and The City this weekend. I even know people who saw it twice. Some of them didn't even like the show and were just seeing it to be ironic. The numbers just don't add up. While $56.8 million is a whole lot of loot and certainly a respectable first weekend take I believe it to be a mathematic impossibility. Something foul is afoot and I demand a recount. Now you might be asking yourself what this would prove? Well, the answer is, absolutely nothing...but maybe just maybe Paramount rigged the numbers so nobody would beat their two most successful summer releases in Indy and Iron Man...or not. I would just like someone to check again because with all of the buzz that surrounded this movie you would've thought it was the only movie out in theaters. I find the numbers to be completely implausible and it hast landed me in a state of utter moviegoing shock. Somehow I would not have been surprised if it earned $500 million, but $56.8 million.

While Sex and the City was busy being a both a monetary and critical disappointment, a couple of other notable films picked up the slack. Indy pulled up in 2nd place with $44.8 million and the new horror thriller, The Strangers earned an impressive $21 million, knocking Iron Man all the way down to 4th place taking it to it's lowest rung on the box office ladder since it's release. Ok film fans, it's safe to go back to the multiplex...and even some of the art house theaters. There'll be less drunk people smuggling in Cosmopolitans this week.



This blog is published by The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy. Visit our website to learn more about our exciting curriculum!

If you enjoyed this article please share it!

21 Tops Gross. Superhero Movie, Just Gross.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

First off, I was surprised to see "21" on top, taking in nearly $24 million. The trailer didn't so much as motivate me to get out of bed, so it was a bit of a shocker that it got that many people in the theaters. I fully expect to see Blackjack take over as the next televised non-sport, similar to what happened with Texas Hold 'Em after "Rounders," complete with boring semi-celebrity tournaments.

It was nice to see "Horton Hears A Who" still raking in the big bucks as well, with $17 million plus. In addition to it being my favorite Seuss story, I had a bit of a grudge against the past Dr. Seuss vehicles because of their live-action format. There's something really annoying about when someone tries to create live action magic with what is best served up as animation. I also like seeing the success of the new breed of comedic actors over the tired gimmicks of people like wacky accent-specialist Mike Myers and the 1970ish schtick of Will Ferrell (who I still think can be somewhat funny). So here's to the Seth Rogen's, Steve Carell's and Jonah Hill's of the world...or not of the world of the actual people.

Finally, in third place was "Superhero Movie," which, despite a the all things Weinstein boycott from Star Wars fanboys still managed to rake in $9.51 million even though it was probably pretty horrible. I think this proves one thing and one thing only: If you're not a film's target audience and you protest it's release, you probably won't affect the film's box office very much, even if it sucks. After all there are plenty of people out there who like laughing at dumb jokes for an extended period of time. Just ask anyone who watches MAD-TV.



This blog is published by The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy. Visit our website to learn more about our exciting curriculum!

If you enjoyed this article please share it!

NYFA Picks The 20 Greatest Movie Directors

Thursday, March 27, 2008

The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy lists its picks for the Twenty Greatest Movie Directors of All Time!



This blog is published by The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy. Visit our website to learn more about our exciting curriculum!

If you enjoyed this article please share it!

Meet Eddie Murphy

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Has anybody seen the trailer for the new Eddie Murphy movie, Meet Dave?

Well, in case you thought that Eddie Murphy had turned over a new leaf after years and years of fat suits and screwball comedies to pursue serious acting, thanks to Oscar nominated landmark films like Dreamgirls and Norbit so you can rest easy. Mr. Murphy is still trying to make us laugh for the first time since 1988's Coming To America.

Don't worry, he's still using his favorite comedic device... himself! That's right. Murphy will once again be playing multiple characters, his M.O. for just about every single one of his movies that didn't involve Axel Foley or a titled referencing an Australian frisbee. The only difference is that this time he'll be doing it in a brand new (old) way. He won't be getting into the ol' Klumps Fat Suit (or does he) or pretending to be a white guy (though he will be using his white guy voice!). This time Eddie Murphy in a wacky new turn of events is portraying a mini-himself inside a robot of himself.

It's all pretty similar to the final skit in Woody Allen's "Everything You Wanted To Know About Sex But Were Afraid To Ask" but (most likely) without Burt Reynolds having any say over this being's erection. Yes, Eddie Murphy will play the roll of the commander of the crew aboard the S.S. Eddie Murphy…a robot he steers through what might be a romantic comedy or a man vs. machine type storyline. We're not exactly sure what it's angling for. All we can tell from the trailer is that the film centers around Eddie Murphy's robot getting to know Elizabeth Banks in New York City, while his Robot Crew fall in coffee and befriends police. In any case we hope the uncertainty we feel towards the film might be salvaged if Mr. Murphy were to dress up as a fat guy inside himself and let loose bodily functions. Because if it's one thing Eddie Murphy does well is dress up like a fat guy and rail on fat guy stereotypes. Or maybe he could just go back to being funny.



This blog is published by The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy. Visit our website to learn more about our exciting curriculum!

If you enjoyed this article please share it!

2008 The Year Oscar Got It Right

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

With the 80th Academy Awards just a couple of weeks behind us, I figured that this was as good a time as any (because it’s my first post for the NYFA) to evaluate this year’s Academy Awards. Let’s forget for a few minutes that every individual’s love of film is a subjective matter and perhaps giving awards to movies proclaiming the best this and that doesn’t necessarily make it so to the general public. After all I bet you could find a few people who have said that their favorite movie of the year is National Treasure 2: Book of Secrets and those very same people probably find most of the films nominated for Academy Awards to be utterly insignificant in their lives.


That being said, often times those with ballots seem to pick the award winners based on politics and appeal to that same general public, choosing the nominee that would make the best story come Oscar time. Perhaps the best example of this trend was several years back, when Julia Roberts took home the Best Actress nod for Erin Brockovich over an astonishing performance by Ellen Burstyn in Requiem for A Dream. The issue here isn’t necessarily that Burstyn’s performance was exponentially better than Roberts, (even though in my estimation it was) but that everyone and their mother knew that Roberts was taking home that statuette due to Roberts’ status as America’s sweetheart and the fact that she had been denied two previous times.

The fact of the matter is that Hollywood likes to play favorites and while this time was no different, as there were certainly favorites heading into the Oscar ceremonies; the major award winners were favorites not because of who they were but more so because of what they had done. With each scene in No Country For Old Men, Javier Bardem’s every move left the audience wracked with tension, so much so that it was hard to recognize that he was an actor playing a role. Ditto for Daniel Day-Lewis, whose mesmerizing turn as Oil prospector Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood carried an entire film on it’s shoulders. There was no running subplot that these guys should win because they’d been there before. They simply won because they had done their jobs and done it well. They lost themselves in their roles and we got lost with them…and maybe became a little scared of them at the same time.

On the female side of the acting categories there were two nominees that seemed to have a potential storied path to Oscar glory in Ellen Page of Juno.and The Savages’ Laura Linney. Page, A young actress in her breakout role was semi-destined to take home Oscar gold. Everyone marveled at the fact that she was such a young actress who turned in an above average performance in an overly smart-alecky film. Barbara Walters tried to illustrate the chasm in the generation gap between Page and the rest of America by quizzically pondering about her ability to understand the music of the Moldy Peaches. Laura Linney’s story was that she was that of Oscar spotlight veteran faced with her 3rd nomination and thusly the 3rd time must in fact be a charm. More than lost in the shuffle of all of that were Marillon Cotillard and to a lesser extent Julie Christy. Both Cotillard’s portrayal of Edith Piaf and Christy’s turn as a woman struggling with Alzheimers were scarcely seen within the North American border. However, that didn’t stop the voters from recognizing truly unique performances and sterling acting ability. In the end relatively unsung Cotillard came away with her first statuette.

When it came down to it for the biggest awards of them all, Best Picture and Best Director maybe it wasn’t such as surprise or shock that No Country For Old Men took home the coveted bald guy honors as it was nearly universally predicted as the odds on favorite. However, this wasn’t a case of a mega-grossing movie such as Titanic that earned a statuette because of its astronomical box office performance and universal epic appeal over movies that were perhaps all around better films. No Country For Old Men took home Best Picture, simply because of the fact that it’s a timeless meditation on right and wrong, good and evil, and the price we pay for being even slightly on the wrong side of that line. Above all, it was simply a great movie and that’s what the Oscar’s are supposed to do: Focus on giving out awards to great performances and great movies not to the circumstances surrounding them.

This post was written for the NYFA Film Industry Blog by Evan Kessler.



This blog is published by The Film School & Acting School at the New York Film Academy. Visit our website to learn more about our exciting curriculum!

If you enjoyed this article please share it!